Berk,<br>
<br>
I can't offhand think of any reason *I* would need this in the
immediate future (I think all of the cases I need are covered by your
original four types). On the other hand, it seems like a useful thing
to have -- I'm all for making things be as flexible as possible. It
seems like someone might want to do this if they wanted to, say, reduce
the LJ or electrostatic interactions between some components of the
system only (performing a "partial mutation" or something), and is
probably flexible enough to cover other cases one would want to do as
well. I think if I were you I would probably include it, just because
it sounds useful. :)<br>
<br>
David<br>
<br><br><div><span class="gmail_quote">On 1/17/06, <b class="gmail_sendername"><a href="mailto:hessb@mpip-mainz.mpg.de">hessb@mpip-mainz.mpg.de</a></b> <<a href="mailto:hessb@mpip-mainz.mpg.de">hessb@mpip-mainz.mpg.de
</a>> wrote:</span><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">Before I start adding the new types of pair interactions<br>I should ask if we need to consider other types of pair
<br>interactions.<br><br>Would it be useful to have a pair type where one<br>can specify the LJ parameters and the charges?<br><br>Berk.<br><br><br><br>----------------------------------------------------------------<br>This message was sent using IMP, the Internet Messaging Program.
<br>_______________________________________________<br>gmx-developers mailing list<br><a href="mailto:gmx-developers@gromacs.org">gmx-developers@gromacs.org</a><br><a href="http://www.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-developers">
http://www.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-developers</a><br>Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the<br>www interface or send it to <a href="mailto:gmx-developers-request@gromacs.org">gmx-developers-request@gromacs.org
</a>.<br></blockquote></div><br>