<html><head></head><body style="word-wrap: break-word; -webkit-nbsp-mode: space; -webkit-line-break: after-white-space; "><div><br></div><div><blockquote type="cite"><div class="gmail_quote"><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin-top: 0px; margin-right: 0px; margin-bottom: 0px; margin-left: 0.8ex; border-left-width: 1px; border-left-color: rgb(204, 204, 204); border-left-style: solid; padding-left: 1ex; position: static; z-index: auto; "><div style="word-wrap:break-word"><div><div style="word-wrap:break-word"><div><blockquote type="cite"><div>Regarding the CHARMM port: this modularity is why it's kind-of hard to port the CHARMM ff "completely".<br>
</div></blockquote></div></div></div></div></blockquote><div>Would my proposed extension (using the tdb syntax similar to patches) help with porting the parts of the CHARMM ff which remains to be ported?</div></div></blockquote></div><div>I would think so yes.</div></body></html>