<html>
<head>
<meta content="text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1"
http-equiv="Content-Type">
</head>
<body bgcolor="#FFFFFF" text="#000000">
On 1/04/2012 9:33 AM, Roland Schulz wrote:
<blockquote
cite="mid:CAO2TwbkOakbK93kCsz6vKnRY-oBKfCmZR4DRqrKJOVQ3FRT3hg@mail.gmail.com"
type="cite"><br>
<br>
<div class="gmail_quote">On Sat, Mar 31, 2012 at 7:25 PM, Mark
Abraham <span dir="ltr"><<a moz-do-not-send="true"
href="mailto:Mark.Abraham@anu.edu.au">Mark.Abraham@anu.edu.au</a>></span>
wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0
.8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
<div class="im">On 1/04/2012 9:20 AM, Roland Schulz wrote:<br>
> Hi,<br>
><br>
> we have a quite long list of commits since 4.5.5 (83),
should we have<br>
> a 4.5.6. release this week? We have a few bugs in
redmine with 4.5.6<br>
> target but they all seem to be low priority to me. Do
we have any<br>
> issues which need to be addressed before 4.5.6?<br>
><br>
<br>
</div>
I have some improvements to the manual in my pipeline that
should<br>
precede a 4.5.6 release because of the repository cross-over,
but am<br>
otherwise happy for 4.5.6 soon.<br>
</blockquote>
<div>Only the branch names are the same between both
repositories. The "manual" repo doesn't have release tags so
far. But it would probably be good to create them from now
on. </div>
<div>While not strictly necessary, I agree, it makes a lot of
sense to release both at the same time.</div>
<br>
</div>
</blockquote>
<br>
Sure... if Appendix D and section 7.3 don't match between code and
manual version then we're creating problems for people for no good
reason.<br>
<br>
Mark<br>
</body>
</html>