<div dir="ltr">I'm very much in favor of this, and I think that having a trade-off of full-static and machine-optimized versus dynamic load of libgromacs is reasonable. Ideally we'd still allow libgromacs to be mostly static if the user wishes. But as Erik says, most platforms that want fully static are also platforms where we can live with compile-time optimizations, particularly if we have the ability to have "dynamic" just be loading a set of libgromacs_XXX.so in a specified directory (e.g. cwd), so we can bundle all the needed libraries.<div>
<br></div><div><div class="gmail_extra">This is something I think is important and something I'm willing to contribute to (pending scheduling commitments of course).</div><div class="gmail_extra"><br></div><div class="gmail_extra">
Cheers,</div><div class="gmail_extra">--Peter<br clear="all"><div><br>----------------------------------------------------------------------<br>Peter Kasson, MD, PhD<br>Assistant Professor<br>Departments of Molecular Physiology and Biological Physics<br>
and of Biomedical Engineering<br>University of Virginia<br></div>
<br></div></div></div>