<html>
<head>
<style><!--
.hmmessage P
{
margin:0px;
padding:0px
}
body.hmmessage
{
font-size: 12pt;
font-family:Calibri
}
--></style></head>
<body class='hmmessage'><div dir='ltr'><pre style="line-height: 21.2999992370605px; white-space: normal; font-family: 'Segoe UI', 'Segoe UI Web Regular', 'Segoe UI Symbol', 'Helvetica Neue', 'BBAlpha Sans', 'S60 Sans', Arial, sans-serif; color: rgb(68, 68, 68); font-size: 15px; background-color: rgb(255, 255, 255);">>>reaction field methods give results comparable to Ewald summations<br style="line-height: 21.2999992370605px;">>> at a fraction of the computational cost.<br style="line-height: 21.2999992370605px;"><br style="line-height: 21.2999992370605px;">>It depends what you call comparable. You may want to check e.g.<br style="line-height: 21.2999992370605px;">>Matthias et al. JCP 118 (2003) 10847--10860 who suggest a 4 nm cutoff <br style="line-height: 21.2999992370605px;">>may be needed, or my own work JCTC 2 (2006) 1-11.<br style="line-height: 21.2999992370605px;"><br>I am outside of an academic setting, working solo, and I do not have access to journal subscriptions. Paying for a copy of those articles is not sustainable for unaffiliated individuals. It bothers me that these journals are off limits to the public, I am not trying to profit from them(who would beside journals?), only build upon their findings and provide them for free to the public. If a good, anonymous Samaritan could drop those papers on my mailbox, I would appreciate it (noelcjr@hotmail.com). It is for a good cause.</pre><br><div>Noel Carrascal</div> </div></body>
</html>