<html>
  <head>
    <meta content="text/html; charset=windows-1252"
      http-equiv="Content-Type">
  </head>
  <body text="#000000" bgcolor="#FFFFFF">
    <div class="moz-cite-prefix">Hi,<br>
      <br>
      If you set an off-diagonal element in deform, you get shear flow.<br>
      <br>
      Cheers,<br>
      <br>
      Berk<br>
      <br>
      On 10/04/2016 07:40 PM, J Hu wrote:<br>
    </div>
    <blockquote
cite="mid:CAGD4nqGCyPL3BuT-riJC15gqap4C=QFuX_pHux7ViF-gk6FtVw@mail.gmail.com"
      type="cite">
      <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html;
        charset=windows-1252">
      <div dir="ltr">Hi Berk,
        <div><br>
        </div>
        <div>Thanks for your advice! </div>
        <div><br>
        </div>
        <div>However, I'm sorry that I do not really understand your
          point... The deform md option should be turned off by default
          right? So how could I adjust it to realize my implement of
          shear flow? Could you please tell me some more details about
          that if you are available? Thanks!</div>
        <div><br>
        </div>
        <div>As for the patch, yes, I would really appreciate it if you
          could share it with me!</div>
        <div><br>
        </div>
        <div>Best wishes</div>
        <div><br>
        </div>
        <div>Jin</div>
      </div>
      <div class="gmail_extra"><br>
        <div class="gmail_quote">2016-10-04 14:22 GMT+01:00 Berk Hess <span
            dir="ltr">&lt;<a moz-do-not-send="true"
              href="mailto:hess@kth.se" target="_blank">hess@kth.se</a>&gt;</span>:<br>
          <blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0
            .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
            <div text="#000000" bgcolor="#FFFFFF">
              <div class="m_-4474147881397635249moz-cite-prefix">Hi,<br>
                <br>
                I think the defrom MD option can do what you want.<br>
                It does not apply the proper SLLOD equations, but I
                think this does not matter under most conditions. If you
                want to use SLLOD, I have a patch for that.<br>
                <br>
                Cheers,<br>
                <br>
                Berk
                <div>
                  <div class="h5"><br>
                    <br>
                    On 10/04/2016 03:06 PM, J Hu wrote:<br>
                  </div>
                </div>
              </div>
              <div>
                <div class="h5">
                  <blockquote type="cite">
                    <div dir="ltr">
                      <p
                        style="margin-top:0px;margin-bottom:0px;font-size:12pt"><i><font
                            face="comic sans ms, sans-serif">Hello,</font></i></p>
                      <p
                        style="margin-top:0px;margin-bottom:0px;font-size:12pt"><i><font
                            face="comic sans ms, sans-serif"><br>
                          </font></i></p>
                      <p
                        style="margin-top:0px;margin-bottom:0px;font-size:12pt"><font
                          face="comic sans ms, sans-serif"><i>I </i><i><i>have
                              recently </i>tried to simulate a shear
                            flow in a molecular dynamics model by
                            implementing the </i><i>Lees Edwards
                            boundary (periodic shear flow) conditions in
                            GROMACS. However the </i><i><i>results </i>I
                            got are strange ...  <br>
                            <br>
                          </i></font></p>
                      <p
                        style="margin-top:0px;margin-bottom:0px;font-size:12pt"><font
                          face="comic sans ms, sans-serif"><i>I added
                            the effect of the shear,
                            delta_U(y)=gamma*dy, where gamma = dU/dy by
                            modifying the coordinate equation dx/dt =
                            ... + gamma*dy  in the x-direction so that
                            coordinate change along the x direction
                            becomes  x(t+dt) = x(t) +
                            dt*[v(t) +gamma*dy]. The </i><i><i>calculation
                              of the molecular dynamics </i>velocity,
                            v(t)  from the pair potential was kept the
                            same as usual from Newton's second law
                            without any change.<br>
                          </i></font></p>
                      <p
                        style="margin-top:0px;margin-bottom:0px;font-size:12pt"><i><font
                            face="comic sans ms, sans-serif"><br>
                          </font></i></p>
                      <font style="font-size:14px" face="comic sans ms,
                        sans-serif"><i style="color:rgb(51,51,51)">To
                          compare with the analytical shear flow
                          solution U(y), I then wrote a routine that
                          averages all atoms velocities in time as well
                          as in the homogeneuous x&amp;z directions and
                          so obtained the velocity profile <span
                            style="font-size:16px">along the y-direction
                            (the  velocity </span></i><i
                          style="color:rgb(51,51,51)"><span
                            style="font-size:16px"><i>information </i>was
                            directly obtained from the gro
                            files). However, strangely, the resulting
                            profile of the mean atom velocity, which I
                            expected to be flat around zero, turned out
                            to</span><span style="font-size:12pt"> have
                            a negative slope, -gamma, as if the model
                            tried to compensate for the positive shear
                            flow I was trying to impose. This effect is
                            very consistent for a range of different
                            shears -- from moderate to very small gamma.</span><span
                            style="font-size:12pt"> So I thought this is
                            due to the thermostat or some other
                            intrinsic GROMACS feature which checks the
                            atom velocities/deviations and </span></i><i
                          style="color:rgb(51,51,51)">holds the
                          velocities to correspond to the uniform state,
                          hence, creates an "anti-shear" effect.<br>
                          <br>
                          Did someone encounter a similar problem in
                          GROMACS and know how to disable these
                          stabilising  features of </i><i
                          style="color:rgb(51,51,51)"><i>GROMACS</i>?  <br>
                          Or, does someone know a simpler method how to
                          generated a shear flow in GROMACS ?</i><i
                          style="color:rgb(51,51,51)"><span
                            style="font-size:12pt"></span></i><span
                          style="color:rgb(51,51,51)"></span></font>
                      <p
                        style="margin-top:0px;margin-bottom:0px;font-size:12pt"><i><font
                            face="comic sans ms, sans-serif"><br>
                          </font></i></p>
                      <p
                        style="margin-top:0px;margin-bottom:0px;font-size:12pt"><i><font
                            face="comic sans ms, sans-serif">Thanks a
                            lot.</font></i></p>
                      <p
                        style="margin-top:0px;margin-bottom:0px;font-size:12pt"><i><font
                            face="comic sans ms, sans-serif"><br>
                          </font></i></p>
                      <p
                        style="margin-top:0px;margin-bottom:0px;font-size:12pt"><i><font
                            face="comic sans ms, sans-serif">Best wishes</font></i></p>
                      <p><i><br>
                        </i></p>
                      <p><i>Jin</i></p>
                    </div>
                    <br>
                    <fieldset
                      class="m_-4474147881397635249mimeAttachmentHeader"></fieldset>
                    <br>
                  </blockquote>
                  <br>
                </div>
              </div>
            </div>
            <br>
            --<br>
            Gromacs Developers mailing list<br>
            <br>
            * Please search the archive at <a moz-do-not-send="true"
              href="http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/GMX-developers_List"
              rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">http://www.gromacs.org/<wbr>Support/Mailing_Lists/GMX-<wbr>developers_List</a>
            before posting!<br>
            <br>
            * Can't post? Read <a moz-do-not-send="true"
              href="http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists"
              rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">http://www.gromacs.org/<wbr>Support/Mailing_Lists</a><br>
            <br>
            * For (un)subscribe requests visit<br>
            <a moz-do-not-send="true"
href="https://maillist.sys.kth.se/mailman/listinfo/gromacs.org_gmx-developers"
              rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">https://maillist.sys.kth.se/<wbr>mailman/listinfo/gromacs.org_<wbr>gmx-developers</a>
            or send a mail to <a moz-do-not-send="true"
              href="mailto:gmx-developers-request@gromacs.org">gmx-developers-request@<wbr>gromacs.org</a>.<br>
          </blockquote>
        </div>
        <br>
      </div>
      <br>
      <fieldset class="mimeAttachmentHeader"></fieldset>
      <br>
    </blockquote>
    <br>
  </body>
</html>