<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN">
<html>
  <head>
    <meta content="text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1"
      http-equiv="Content-Type">
  </head>
  <body text="#000000" bgcolor="#ffffff">
    On 25/12/2010 1:12 PM, Qin Qiao wrote:
    <blockquote
      cite="mid:AANLkTikN++gXLBHq2p2Q9-MvJcKAfJ3pXG4RqKJhoyNr@mail.gmail.com"
      type="cite">Thanks a lot! <br>
      <br>
      It says Nose-hoover coupling generates the correct canonical
      ensemble, and that's the reason why I used it. I wonder whether
      v-rescale can also get the correct ensemble. Could you tell me?<br>
      <br>
      I'm quite curious how to choose the frequency of the T-coupling in
      REMD. Though it seems the higher the frequency, the more accurate
      T will be, I wonder whether it will get artifacts for in MD run..
      since the warning in Gromacs says tau_t should be 20 times bigger
      than dt*nsttcouple..<br>
    </blockquote>
    <br>
    Consider what you mean by "accurate T". You actually wish to sample
    from a given "constant" temperature ensemble. However that ensemble
    does not show its average T at every instant - the conserved
    quantity is not actually temperature. What you want is the right
    average T and the right fluctuations. Probably you want to read the
    literature for the T-coupling algorithms to learn more about the
    details here... Probably I should also too :-)<br>
    <br>
    Mark<br>
    <br>
    <blockquote
      cite="mid:AANLkTikN++gXLBHq2p2Q9-MvJcKAfJ3pXG4RqKJhoyNr@mail.gmail.com"
      type="cite">
      <br>
      Best,<br>
      <br>
      Qin <br>
      <br>
      <div class="gmail_quote">2010/12/25 David van der Spoel <span
          dir="ltr">&lt;<a moz-do-not-send="true"
            href="mailto:spoel@xray.bmc.uu.se">spoel@xray.bmc.uu.se</a>&gt;</span><br>
        <blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt
          0.8ex; border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204);
          padding-left: 1ex;">
          <div class="im">On 12/24/10 6:40 PM, ms wrote:<br>
            <blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt
              0.8ex; border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204);
              padding-left: 1ex;">
              On 24/12/10 12:26, David van der Spoel wrote:<br>
              <br>
              <blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt
                0.8ex; border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204);
                padding-left: 1ex;">
                <blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin: 0pt 0pt
                  0pt 0.8ex; border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204);
                  padding-left: 1ex;">
                  I'm not an expert, but isn't Berendsen usually not
                  used because it<br>
                  doesn't give a correct ensemble? I may be partial
                  because I personally<br>
                  know Giovanni Bussi, but it seems from what I've heard
                  that v-rescale is<br>
                  the best choice usually.<br>
                  <br>
                </blockquote>
                V-rescale is a good choice. Berendsen not only gives you
                the wrong<br>
                ensemble but it also biases the energy distribution to
                lower energies.<br>
              </blockquote>
              <br>
              Out of curiosity: why is it still supported in GROMACS?
              Wouldn't lead to<br>
              less confusion if it is removed? :)<br>
              <br>
            </blockquote>
          </div>
          It's still useful for equilibration, e.g. gas to liquid
          conversion.<br>
          <br>
          -- <br>
          David.<br>
________________________________________________________________________<br>
          <font color="#888888">
            David van der Spoel, PhD, Professor of Biology<br>
            Dept. of Cell and Molecular Biology, Uppsala University.<br>
            Husargatan 3, Box 596, &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;75124 Uppsala, Sweden<br>
            phone: &nbsp;46 18 471 4205 &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;fax: 46 18 511 755<br>
            <a moz-do-not-send="true" href="mailto:spoel@xray.bmc.uu.se"
              target="_blank">spoel@xray.bmc.uu.se</a> &nbsp; &nbsp;<a
              moz-do-not-send="true" href="mailto:spoel@gromacs.org"
              target="_blank">spoel@gromacs.org</a> &nbsp; <a
              moz-do-not-send="true" href="http://folding.bmc.uu.se"
              target="_blank">http://folding.bmc.uu.se</a><br>
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++</font>
          <div>
            <div class="h5"><br>
              -- <br>
              gmx-users mailing list &nbsp; &nbsp;<a moz-do-not-send="true"
                href="mailto:gmx-users@gromacs.org" target="_blank">gmx-users@gromacs.org</a><br>
              <a moz-do-not-send="true"
                href="http://lists.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users"
                target="_blank">http://lists.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users</a><br>
              Please search the archive at <a moz-do-not-send="true"
                href="http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/Search"
                target="_blank">http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/Search</a>
              before posting!<br>
              Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use
              the www interface or send it to <a moz-do-not-send="true"
                href="mailto:gmx-users-request@gromacs.org"
                target="_blank">gmx-users-request@gromacs.org</a>.<br>
              Can't post? Read <a moz-do-not-send="true"
                href="http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists"
                target="_blank">http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists</a><br>
            </div>
          </div>
        </blockquote>
      </div>
      <br>
    </blockquote>
    <br>
  </body>
</html>