<div class="gmail_quote">On Thu, May 5, 2011 at 7:23 PM, Peter C. Lai <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:pcl@uab.edu">pcl@uab.edu</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex;">
On 2011-05-05 03:22:14PM -0500, Vitaly Chaban wrote:<br>
> Hey,<br>
><br>
> Could anybody share the executable of gromacs 4.X.X for windows, please?<br>
><br>
> On a related note, if the procedure of compilation is available, why not to put the resulting executable(s) for download?<br>
> <a href="http://www.gromacs.org/Downloads/Installation_Instructions/Windows" target="_blank">http://www.gromacs.org/Downloads/Installation_Instructions/Windows</a><br>
><br>
<br>
Not sure if it will help, as you will still need to figure out how to<br>
get the FFTW libraries on there, and then gromacs would have had to be<br>
(re)compiled so it knew where to locate them. Plus how to define whether<br>
you wanted 32bit or 64bit and single vs. double precision. IMO there are<br>
just way too many permutations to provide binaries for all of them, even<br>
if it was statically linked to fftw.<br>
<br>
Anyway, there are no binaries for any other platforms to download either<br>
(so it's not like it's a windows-specific observation).</blockquote><div><br></div><div> </div></div>For teaching purposes, it would be really great to have a line of statically linked windows versions. Even if it the only default executable per version, i.e. single-precision, 32-bit, so on....<div>
<br clear="all"><br>-- <br>Dr. Vitaly V. Chaban, Department of Chemistry<br>University of Rochester, Rochester, New York 14627-0216<br>
</div>