Justin<br><div class="gmail_quote"><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;"><div class="im"><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">
<br>
</blockquote>
<br></div>
I can't access the file, so I don't know. 20 iterations still doesn't sound like enough for the tutorial system, unless you shrunk faster than what was recommended.</blockquote><div><br>20 iteration was a simple example. It means that many iterations produced more accuracy results in comparison to previous one :)<br>
Its only one not understood for me.<br>After 20 iterations I've obtained S per lipid value= 0.2 nm^2. It's equal to 2 A^2 ( 1A=0.1 nm) <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Angstrom">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Angstrom</a> <br>
Why you told in the tutorial that experimental value was 65 A^2 ? <br></div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;"><div class="im">
<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">
<br>
</blockquote>
<br></div>
Perhaps the value you have set in vdwradii.dat for C radii is too large for genbox to function properly. <br></blockquote><div><br>It seems that this is true because I've defined vdv radii as 0.4 instead of 0.375. Could the differense in the 0.015 result in the error? <br>
<br><br><br>James</div></div><br>