[gmx-users] Re: Alternative TRP residue

abelius abelius at gmail.com
Fri Jun 12 15:41:22 CEST 2009


Since the charges / bond lengths and angles were obtained for QM 
calculations for the excited state of TRP I'm wondering if it would make 
sense to apply the alternative bond lengths and keep the force constants 
of TRP in the ground state?
Cheers,
Abel

Justin A. Lemkul wrote:
>
>
> abelius wrote:
>>
>> But How can I determine this constant? (I guess using the one of 
>> normal TRP would make no sense)
>
> I would suggest reading the primary literature for your force field of 
> interest.  How did the original authors assign these parameters?  
> Usually bonded information comes from experimental data (spectroscopy, 
> etc.)
>
> -Justin
>
>> Thanks,
>> Abel
>>
>>
>>
>> Justin A. Lemkul wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> abelius wrote:
>>>> Thank you for your reply,
>>>>
>>>> I was just struggling to get the ffxxxbon.rtp syntax right since I 
>>>> only have atom distances to create the bonds.
>>>> So can anyone tell me what the correct syntax is for these defines 
>>>> in the ffxxxbon.rtp file?
>>>>
>>>> #define <name> <distance in nm?> <?>
>>>>
>>>
>>> ? = force constant
>>>
>>>> Furthermore where and how can I add the angle information?
>>>>
>>>
>>> Angles are defined similarly
>>>
>>> #define <name> <equilibrium angle> <force constant>
>>>
>>> -Justin
>>>
>>>> Thanks,
>>>> Abel
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Gerrit Groenhof wrote:
>>>>> You can use #define's
>>>>>
>>>>> Like
>>>>> [ bonds ]
>>>>> C1 C2 e_c1c2
>>>>>
>>>>> Then in the ffxxxbon.rtp
>>>>>  you define these things explicitly
>>>>>
>>>>> #define e_c1c2 0.15 123445
>>>>>
>>>>> Gerrit
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>




More information about the gromacs.org_gmx-users mailing list