[gmx-users] amber99sb in GROMACS vs amber99sb in AMBER

Thomas Evangelidis tevang3 at gmail.com
Fri Nov 25 00:16:20 CET 2011


Hi Oliver,

Apologies for the late reply. The comparison you have showed us has been
done for a DNA fragment. Do you believe that negligible errors can also be
obtained for proteins using the amber99sb force field?

thanks,
Thomas



On 22 November 2011 11:58, Oliver Grant <olivercgrant at gmail.com> wrote:

> Hi there,
>
> Acpype does the conversion for you and the results from their own testing
> are here:
> http://code.google.com/p/acpype/wiki/TestingAcpypeAmb2gmx
>
> For reproducing experimental data I would look in the original force-field
> publications.
>
> Oliver
>
>
> On Mon, Nov 21, 2011 at 8:21 PM, Michael Shirts <mrshirts at gmail.com>wrote:
>
>> > Is anyone aware of any benchmark analysis about the implementation of
>> the
>> > amber99sb force field (or any of its variants: 99sb-ildn, 99sb-nmr) in
>> > GROMACS and AMBER. I am interested to know in what extend the energies
>> > correlate and if the results agree with experimental data.
>>
>> Whether the results compare agree with experimental data is irrelevant
>> to the correctness of the implementation -- that has to do with the
>> validity of AMBER99sb to begin with.  The only question is, do GROMACS
>> and AMBER give the same energies for the same configurations?
>>
>> I actually do not know the answer, and would be interested to hear if
>> it's been tested.  http://ffamber.cnsm.csulb.edu/ does not appear to
>> have the very comprehensive tests that appear for earlier models at
>> the current time.  I SUSPECT there should not be a problem, since
>> AMBER99sb just changed a couple of torsions, so errors are unlikely
>> (though in theory possible).
>> --
>> gmx-users mailing list    gmx-users at gromacs.org
>> http://lists.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
>> Please search the archive at
>> http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/Search before posting!
>> Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the
>> www interface or send it to gmx-users-request at gromacs.org.
>> Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists
>>
>
>
> --
> gmx-users mailing list    gmx-users at gromacs.org
> http://lists.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
> Please search the archive at
> http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/Search before posting!
> Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the
> www interface or send it to gmx-users-request at gromacs.org.
> Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists
>



-- 

======================================================================

Thomas Evangelidis

PhD student

Biomedical Research Foundation, Academy of Athens

4 Soranou Ephessiou , 115 27 Athens, Greece

email: tevang at bioacademy.gr

          tevang3 at gmail.com


website: https://sites.google.com/site/thomasevangelidishomepage/
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://maillist.sys.kth.se/pipermail/gromacs.org_gmx-users/attachments/20111125/800650ec/attachment.html>


More information about the gromacs.org_gmx-users mailing list