[gmx-users] Switching Group to Verlet

Mark Abraham mark.j.abraham at gmail.com
Sat Oct 22 15:21:46 CEST 2016


Hi,

In theory, yes. But energy minimization is only sometimes done on a
cluster, and when it is done on one, it's mostly part of a larger workflow,
for which there is a lot more I/O, network and terminal-output traffic from
other GROMACS system-preparation tasks.

Mark

On Sat, Oct 22, 2016 at 2:48 PM Mahmood Naderan <mahmood.nt at gmail.com>
wrote:

> Well such message flooding  that is written in the log file at every step,
> the network will be a bottleneck affecting the performance of the other
> jobs
>
> Regards,
> Mahmood
>
>
>
> On Sat, Oct 22, 2016 at 3:42 PM, Mark Abraham <mark.j.abraham at gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > This is an energy minimization. Its behaviour is to print every step, and
> > if that's verbose, it doesn't matter for the number of steps that are
> > typically required. A dynamical simulation has different needs and works
> > differently.
> >
> > Mark
> >
> --
> Gromacs Users mailing list
>
> * Please search the archive at
> http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/GMX-Users_List before
> posting!
>
> * Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists
>
> * For (un)subscribe requests visit
> https://maillist.sys.kth.se/mailman/listinfo/gromacs.org_gmx-users or
> send a mail to gmx-users-request at gromacs.org.
>


More information about the gromacs.org_gmx-users mailing list